Konekte ak nou

Biofuels

#EUBionergy: Inyon Ewopeyen règleman dwe pwoteje klima, rekòt ak forè

SHARE:

pibliye

on

Nou itilize enskripsyon ou pou bay kontni nan fason ou te konsanti ak amelyore konpreyansyon nou sou ou. Ou ka koupe abònman nan nenpòt ki lè.

161020bioenergy2Environmental organizations today (20 October) wrapped up a massive social media campaign that directed twitter messages at two powerful European Commission members who this autumn are charged with helping overhaul crucial European Union bioenergy policies.

The messages shared a common demand: The EU must fundamentally change the way it treats burning wood and other biomass to generate energy so that bio-energy policies finally “protect our climate, crops and forests.” Contrary to their original intent, current EU policies and subsidies now result in distorted outcomes which actually harm biodiversity and worsen climate change.

Environmental groups and their allies rallied around the #EUbioenergy ak #SOSforests hashtags. They focused a barrage of mesaj on two key decision-makers whose bioenergy policy positions are being closely monitored around the world – European Commission Vice President Maroš Šefčovič and Climate Commissioner Miguel Arias Cañete.

The messages originated from at least 29 counties across five continents. The messages reached nearly 1.5 million people worldwide. The sprawling social media action was part of the 19 October “International Day of Action on Bioenergy.” It was timed to influence an upcoming, high-stakes decision by the European Commission on a new EU bio energy policy.

The campaigers call onCommissioners Šefčovič (responsible for energy) and Cañete (responsible for climate change), and the European Commission as a whole to urgently fix flawed renewable energy policies that have failed to decrease carbon emissions effectively, precipitated an alarming spike in clear-cut logging of native Southeastern US forests and razed European forests. A new bioenergy policy that is based on the latest science and that better protects the environment is needed now, according to the groups.

Europe is perched on the front lines of industrial biomass expansion, so policy changes in Brussels have an outsized impact on the international biomass market. New EU bioenergy policies are expected as soon as early December.

Tweets supporting the International Day of Action on Bioenergy originated from the following countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Scotland, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam, and Wales.

reklam

Participating organizations made the following statements:

“This isn’t just a European issue or a renewable energy issue,” said Debbie Hammel, director of NRDC’s Land Markets Initiative. “This is a climate issue. Chopping down trees in the US to keep the lights on in Europe is not a clean energy solution. It hastens climate change and undermines international efforts to cut carbon now.”

"EU’s taxpayers are funding bio-energy projects that are worsening global warming and destroying forests,” said Linde Zuidema, bio-energy campaigner at forest NGO Fern. “To make its renewable policy credible, the EU should drastically limit its overall bio-energy use and prohibit the use of round-wood.”

“We raise our voices today because we have already seen first-hand and up-close the negative impacts of the uncontrolled use of bio-energy. We want to see a policy that changes the ongoing destructive practices and outcomes. The new EU policy needs to put an end to burning trees and food for energy, and focus instead on using residues and waste biomass only, recognizing that these sources are limited. In the case of bio-energy the assumption that using more is better is wrong,” said Sini Eräjää, BirdLife Europe’s EU Bio-energy Policy Officer.

“It has become perfectly clear that bio-energy policies have had a negative impact on our forests, communities and climate and the EU Commission is in the position to fix this mistake,” said Adam Macon, Campaign Director at Dogwood Alliance. “Today we stand with communities from around the world to deliver a clear message, the time is now to stop using our forests for fuel.”

 

For more information on how harmful EU biomass policies are impacting the world, please see the following resources:

·         NRDC’s report (released 17 October) “Money To Burn: The U.K. Needs to Dump Biomass and Replace its Coal Plants with Truly Clean Energy.”

·         Organized by the Dogwood Alliance, dozens of local US elected officials earlier this month sent lèt sa a to EU commissioners. The letter voices concerns over negative impacts EU bio-energy policies and associated subsidies have on US communities.

·         Fern’s report (released 19 October) “A Dangerous Delusion: How Europe’s sustainable forest debate distracts from a failing policy” and an accompanying moso opinyon.

·         Fern’s briefing note (released 18 October) “Burning trees for energy is no solution to climate change.”

·         Joint NGO bioenergy sustainability rekòmandasyon politik for the EU (published September 2016).

·         This blog tracks the latest EU bioenergy developments.

Pataje atik sa a:

EU Reporter pibliye atik ki soti nan yon varyete sous deyò ki eksprime yon pakèt pwen de vi. Pozisyon yo pran nan atik sa yo pa nesesèman sa yo nan EU Reporter.

Tendans